Uploaded on Sep 3, 2026
Facing breast cancer surgery can raise an important question: should you have a lumpectomy or a mastectomy? This patient-friendly guide explains the differences between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy, including what each procedure involves, when each may be suitable, the role of radiotherapy and breast reconstruction, and how clinical factors and personal priorities influence the decision. The guide also discusses current evidence comparing breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy and mastectomy, while explaining why observational evidence should be interpreted carefully. It covers tumour size and position, breast size, multiple tumours, lymph-node surgery, reconstruction and oncoplastic techniques. Prepared by Dr. Melanie Seah, Consultant Breast Surgeon in Singapore, this resource is intended to help patients understand their surgical options and prepare for an informed discussion with their breast surgeon. Learn more: https://melaniebreastspecialist.com/services/breast-cancer-treatment/
Lumpectomy vs Mastectomy: Understanding Breast Cancer Surgery Options
Breast Cancer Surgery Options: Lumpectomy vs Mastectomy
By Dr Melanie Seah, FRCS (Edin), Consultant Breast Surgeon — Melanie Breast
Specialist, Singapore
September 2026
Quick Answer: A lumpectomy removes the tumour together with a margin of surrounding
tissue and leaves the rest of the breast intact; a mastectomy removes the whole breast
including the nipple. For early-stage breast cancer, both are offered as accepted surgical
options, with radiotherapy given after a lumpectomy. Which one is appropriate depends on
tumour size and position, breast size, whether there is more than one tumour, and the
woman’s own priorities.
Being told you need breast cancer surgery is rarely followed by a single obvious choice.
Most women with early-stage disease in Singapore are presented with two routes —
breast-conserving surgery, commonly called a lumpectomy, or a mastectomy — and asked
to weigh them alongside their surgeon.
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in Singapore,
accounting for around 30 per cent of all female cancer diagnoses according to the
Singapore Cancer Society. This guide sets out what each operation involves in 2026, who
each is suited to, and what the evidence says about how they compare.
What each operation involves
A lumpectomy removes the tumour along with a margin of normal breast tissue, leaving
the remainder of the breast in place. The Singapore Cancer Society notes that radiotherapy
is then given to the breast over a six-week course, and describes the combination as safe
with a low recurrence rate.
A mastectomy removes the whole breast, including the nipple. Radiotherapy is
recommended after a mastectomy where the risk of local recurrence is high, and where
lymph nodes are involved or the tumour is more than 4cm across.
Both operations are usually accompanied by surgery to the armpit. A sentinel lymph node
biopsy samples the one or two nodes that drain the breast first, and is suited to smaller
tumours with no palpable nodes. Where nodes are clearly involved, a fuller axillary
dissection is performed instead.
Comparing the two
Lumpectomy (breast-
conserving surgery) Mastectomy
Tissue removed Tumour plus a margin of Whole breast including the
normal tissue nipple
Breast preserved Yes, reshaped as needed No — reconstruction may
be offered
Radiotherapy Routinely given, over six Where recurrence risk is
weeks high, nodes involved, or
tumour over 4cm
Typically suited to Tumour under 2–3cm, away Larger tumours, two or
from the nipple, suitable more tumours in the same
breast size breast, or where
conservation is unsuitable
Generally not suitable for Women under 30, —
pregnancy, connective
tissue disease, multiple
tumours in one breast
Reconstruction Oncoplastic reshaping at Implant or skin-muscle flap,
the same operation immediate or delayed
Suitability criteria as published by the Singapore Cancer Society. Individual assessment may
differ.
What the evidence says about survival
Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy and mastectomy have long been offered as
equivalent surgical options for early-stage breast cancer, on the basis of randomised trials
conducted in the 1970s and 1980s. More recent observational data has not shown breast
conservation to be the poorer choice.
A 2024 meta-analysis published in BJS Open pooled 35 observational studies covering
909,077 patients and reported a hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI 0.68–0.75) favouring breast-
conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy over mastectomy. The authors were careful
about how far this should be taken: they rated the overall certainty of the evidence as very
low, noted that 34 of the 35 studies carried a high risk of bias from confounding, and stated
the findings “should be interpreted with caution”.
Read fairly, that body of evidence supports breast conservation as a sound option where it
is clinically appropriate. It does not establish that one operation produces better outcomes
than the other, and it should not be used to push a decision in either direction.
How the decision is actually made
The choice is made on clinical suitability first. Tumour size relative to breast size, the
position of the tumour, whether there is more than one cancer in the breast, and the
findings on imaging and biopsy all narrow the options before preference enters the
discussion.
Where both operations are genuinely available, the decision moves to what matters to the
woman. Some prefer to avoid a six-week course of radiotherapy. Others place greater
weight on keeping their own breast tissue. Neither preference is the wrong one.
Reconstruction is part of this conversation rather than a separate one. Following a
mastectomy, the breast can be reconstructed using an implant or a skin-muscle flap taken
from elsewhere on the body. The Singapore Cancer Society notes that neither an implant
nor a reconstructed breast has been found to interfere with the detection of recurrence or
to increase recurrence risk.
Surgical treatment and the appearance of the result are planned together at Melanie Breast
Specialist in Singapore, using oncoplastic techniques and, where reconstruction is
appropriate, working alongside a reconstructive plastic surgeon. Clinic physiotherapists
support shoulder movement and recovery afterwards. A growing number of women in
Singapore are now aware that breast-conserving and oncoplastic approaches exist as
alternatives to mastectomy where they are clinically suitable — a shift worth knowing
about before a decision is made.
What to do next
If you have been diagnosed with breast cancer and are weighing surgical options, ask your
surgeon which operations are clinically available to you, and why. Melanie Breast Specialist
is a breast surgery clinic in Singapore led by Dr Melanie Seah, providing breast cancer
surgery, oncoplastic surgery and reconstruction, and post-operative care. Appointments
can be arranged by telephone or email through the clinic.
About the author
Dr Melanie Seah is a Consultant Breast Surgeon in Singapore specialising in breast cancer
screening, diagnosis, surgery and oncoplastic reconstruction. Trained at the National
University of Singapore, she holds Fellowship accreditation from the Royal College of
Surgeons of Edinburgh and completed fellowship training in breast oncoplastic surgery in
Germany.
This article is for informational purposes only. Please consult a qualified healthcare
professional.
Comments