Where Do I Start the Story of My scientific communication Research This Study Shows Podcast – Pubrica
                     Where Do I Start the Story 
of  My scientific 
communication  Research ? 
This Study Shows  Podcast
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, 
Pubrica  Group:www.pubrica.com
Email: [email protected]
Today's Outline
In brief  
Introductio
n
Qualitative process research 
 Useful guidelines
Podcasts about science: a 
look at global
production and output 
 Science podcasting  
Conclusion
About pubrica
Bijou Solutions, Inc. | 2020
In brief
Many businesspeople have already seen the  
practical impact of storytelling, having 
witnessed  how fascinating a well-crafted 
story can be.
But, on the other hand, recent scientific 
research  focuses on how stories affect our 
attitudes,  beliefs, and behaviours.
Introduction
Stories have also been found to be beneficial within  
corporations, according to research. People are far  
more driven by their organization’s transcendent  
mission (how it affects lives) than by its transactional  
goal, according to research (how it sells goods and  
services).
The transcendent purpose is best communicated  
through stories, such as explaining the disturbing  
situations of real-life clients and how your efforts  
helped them overcome their difficulties.
Make your employees sympathize with the  
customer’s distress, and they’ll enjoy the satisfaction  
of its resolution - much more so if any heroics were  
involved in alleviating suffering or bringing delight.
Many of us know from work that enduring stories  
have a dramatic arc in which a character suffers and  
finally discovers previously undiscovered skills they  
utilize to overcome hardship; my Research paper  
writing services demonstrates that the brain is drawn 
 to this story type.
Qualitative  
process research
Although qualitative process research paper support is growing more common,  
writers frequently struggle to create an effective report.
Process articles must show a tight connection between process facts and 
 process theory while also engaging the reader.
This necessitates weighing the pros and cons of various alternatives
for  producing narratives, ideas, and theoretical process models.
According to this article, inductive, 
conceptualization,  and model-led are three 
compositional structures  that writers might employ 
to write their results.
We go through their essential qualities, advantages  
and disadvantages, and requirements for efficient  
usage and provide examples for inspiration.

Useful guidelines
Except for a few personal explanations, the excellent  
instructions on writing up qualitative management  
research give little direction on communicating the  
findings from qualitative process research. Furthermore,
researchers have differing (sometimes implicit)  
perspectives on how to write good qualitative process  
research articles, scientific Communication which can  
cause reviewers and editors to push in opposite ways,  
even for the same study.
For example, we’ve been told to incorporate analytical “telling” into 
an  empirical story while still separating them; alternatively, we’ve 
been  told to start with facts and then theory, or the other way 
around.
Although a generally established style for publishing findings may  
make readers’, authors’, reviewers’, and editors’ lives easier, it is  
ineffective for qualitative research and scientific writing.
To harness the complexity and influence of process research and  
accommodate diversity in phenomena, viewpoints, and study aims,  
variety in reporting findings is required.
Podcasts about science: a look 
 at global production and 
oPuodctapsts uhavte been gaining popularity as a new decentralized media for 
free  and autonomous communication with worldwide audiences since 2004.
Podcasts are generally audio-only, hosted online, and delivered to listeners  
via direct, on-demand audio and video downloads to PCs, MP3 players,  
interactive media devices, and cell phones.
Episodes of a podcast series can be spontaneously downloaded to app-  
enabled devices via a free opt-in subscription to certain audio series ‘feeds.
Audiences find audio podcasts particularly useful since they can be listened 
to  while doing other things without glancing at a screen.
Podcasts may also provide supplemental “show notes,”including text, 
hyperlinks,  and photos.
Podcasts are handy for content creators since they may be made using little  
equipment, such as a microphone, audio recording/editing software, a hosting 
web  service, or even a single smartphone (3).
Like broadcast radio programmes, podcasts may be produced with high-
end  professional production standards despite minimum technological 
needs.
Science podcasting
For the first time, large-scale patterns in science podcasting have been  
highlighted in this study. Between 2004 and 2010, the overall number of 
science  podcast series increased linearly, and between 2010 and 2018, it 
increased  exponentially.
There were 952 science podcast series that fulfilled the study’s inclusion  
criteria, putting a lowerbound on the number of English-language science  
podcasts accessible at the start of 2018.
The majority of science podcast series (87%) are audio-only, with the number 
of  new video-format science podcast series decreasing from over 30% in 
2007 to  barely 5% in 2017.
This might indicate that podcast listeners prefer to listen to podcasts while  
doing things incompatible with seeing video material.
Various particular disciplines were well represented by specialized audio 
series,  although one-third of scientific podcast series included many fields of 
science.
Chemistry appears to be under-represented as a topic, with just 3% of podcast  
series devoted to it, compared to 18% for ‘physics and astronomy’ and 13% for  
‘biology.’
This apparent underrepresentation in podcasting might be a reflection of long-
term  tendencies in scientific communication, where chemistry has been  
underrepresented as a distinct discipline.
This might also reflect the belief that visual mediums, rather than just auditory  
podcasts, are superior for presenting chemistry Scientific research support
Conclusion
In the future, a combination of quantitative and qualitative  
approaches may be required to gain more insight into science  
podcasters’ motivations,
why they choose to produce the podcasts that they do, and how  
science podcasts are meeting the need for science communication  
across geographic boundaries.
About pubrica
Science can be communicated in several ways and Pubrica  
medical communication team offers the best integrated and  
customised solutions in medico-market and convert into ting  
solutions to healthcare/pharmaceutical companies/food and  
beverage companies.
We serve pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturers,  
hospital, medical advertising, publishers, managed care  
organisation, academic medical centers, Information Technology  
Healthcare products /websites association.
Contact  Us
UNITED KINGDOM
+44-  7424810299
INDIA
+91-9884350006
EMAIL
sales@pubr ica.com