Uploaded on Aug 18, 2021
“Life is a helluva thing. You can see trouble coming and you can’t do a damn thing to prevent it coming. You just gotta sit and watch and wait.” From Miguel Street, by VS Naipaul There is perhaps no greater mark of a writer’s genius that you cannot read him through his words: anyone who ever heard, saw, or watched V S Naipaul engage in the real world will find this throwaway philosophical aside on life entirely alien to their experience of the man who was famously precise, pitiless, and impatient. Yet, that same experience of the man makes the words inescapably his: economical, deeply weighted, deceptively simple.
Tarun Tejpal - No Mimic Man, this the incredible life of VS Naipaul
No Mimic Man,
this: the incredible
life of VS Naipaul
“Life is a helluva thing. You can see trouble coming and you can’t do a damn
thing to prevent it coming. You just gotta sit and watch and wait.” From Miguel Street, by VS Naipaul
There is perhaps no greater mark of a writer’s genius that you cannot read him through his words: anyone who ever heard, saw, or watched V S Naipaul engage in the real world will find this throwaway philosophical aside on life entirely
alien to their experience of the man who was famously precise, pitiless, and impatient. Yet, that same experience of the man makes the words inescapably his: economical, deeply weighted, deceptively simple.
To describe Sir Vidiadhar Surajprasad Naipaul — or V S Naipaul as he came to
be universally known — as a ‘writer' is to describe Einstein as a scientist; in
many ways, for many writers of the postcolonial era, he was the writer;
inventor of a form, a language, a way of seeing that simply did not exist before
him; a man who used the same language available to them but somehow re-
formed it in his writing, turning the most simple of words, most lucid of phrases
into vehicles of the deepest, darkest complexity.
That was why not only readers but fellow writers of every age, race, culture
and orientation — including those who had bitterly, often viciously disagreed
with the famously irascible writer — were joined, briefly, for a collective
outpouring of grief when he passed away on 11th August 2018, just a week
short of his 86th birthday.
Born on 17th August 1932, in Chaguanas, Trinidad, the grandson of indentured
slaves who had emigrated there from India, Naipaul’s singular sensibility was,
it seemed, forged out of otherness: a Trinidad and Tobago born Indian-origin
writer who went on to settle in the land of his ancestors’ colonisation.
While his early novels set in Trinidad seem to speak of a young man still
finding his material and his voice, he nonetheless, by the time he was 30, had
already written one of the greatest works of 20th century literature, A House
for Mr Biswas. Over the next decade-and-half — by the time he was 45, he had
published a jaw-dropping 15 books — he acquired global acclaim for his almost
otherworldly grasp and rendering of alienation, and for his vigilant chronicles
of life and travel and of authorisation.
In many ways the man who was hailed as one of the greatest writers of the
20th century could also be hailed as a seer, intuitively grasping the potential
for radicalisation, for brutality and for human darkness that has come to so
deeply mark our present.
In announcing him as the winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize for Literature — some
thought he should have won decades prior — the Swedish Academy referred to
him as the “modern philosopher”, a writer of incorruptible scrutiny who
compels us to see suppressed histories.
This, then, was the loss, on 11th August 2018 — not merely a writer of extraordinary prose but an unflinching seer of the human condition, whose novels relied on the inherent irony of events to illuminate the truth of the world, a writer who
was at once called “a writer’s writer” and who triggered their fiercest anger for the often uncompromising bleakness with which he looked both at the country of his origin — India — and the land of his birth, the West Indies, as well as his
visceral gaze on the African continent.
He called himself the sum of his books; that his books say everything there is
to say about him. Describing his journey in his essay, Prologue to An
Autobiography, he wrote, “Half a writer’s work… is the discovery of his subject.
And a problem for me was that my life had been varied, full of upheavals and
moves: from grandmother’s Hindu house in the country, still close to the
rituals and social ways of village India, to Port of Spain, the negro, and G.I. life
of its streets, the other, ordered life of my colonial English school, which is
called Queen’s Royal College, and then Oxford, London and the freelancer’s
room at the BBC. Trying to make a beginning as a writer, I didn’t know where
to focus.”
And still, with no idea of his material and no sense of the ‘genre’ he wanted to
occupy, writing was all he ever wanted to do. In a sweeping, often revealing
interview with author and journalist Tarun Tejpal, he remarked that his only
ambition was to become a successful writer, to be known for his writing all
over all the world, right from the age of 10.
He didn’t know how he would become one, he told Tarun Tejpal, or what he
would write about, but the fact of writing, and the need to become a famous
writer drove him; it was the only noble profession, he said.
He hoped, he said, that writing would come miraculously to him. Yet, when Sir V S Naipaul started to write, his first two novels failed to hold — till just before his 23rd birthday, he got the idea to write the first sentence of the book that went
on to be published as Miguel Street, from a childhood memory.
The book came to him in a sweeping flow then; he finished the entire book within just six weeks in 1955. It was, unfortunately, not to be published until 1959. But by then, his breakthrough came in 1957 when he published the novel The
Mystic Masseur.
No-one, perhaps led by Naipaul himself, could have envisioned the stunning
arc of the next 50 years and his undisputed place as one of literature’s all time
greats.
He wrote just over 30 books, both fiction and non-fiction — an output not
merely extraordinary but almost impossible to grasp, given the epic quality
and sweep of the work he produced. Tarun Tejpal, interviewing the temperamental genius live in front of a packed hall of 2,000 at THiNK fest, remarked that the
number of books Naipaul single-handedly wrote are equal to the work of almost 10 writers together.
While the Nobel prize was the penultimate of literary honours, it was hardly his only: in 1971, three decades before the Nobel, Sir VS Naipaul won the Booker Prize for his book In a Free State; he also won every other literary prize of note
including the Jerusalem Prize, Trinidad and Tobago’s highest honour The Trinity Prize, and was knighted by his adoptive country, the UK, giving him the honorific Sir V S Naipaul.
Tarun J Tejpal is a journalist, publisher and novelist. In a career spanning 26 years, Tarun Tejpal has been the editor of the India Today and Indian Express groups and the managing editor of Outlook, India's
leading news magazine. In March 2000, he started Tehelka, a news organization that has earned a global reputation for its aggressive public interest journalism. Tarun Tejpal's first novel, The Alchemy of Desire, was published in 2005.
Tarun J Tejpal's second novel, The Story of My Assassins, was published in 2009 to rave reviews. Also you can check Tarun J Tejpal.
Comments