Uploaded on Dec 18, 2025
Technology partnerships can accelerate innovation, but they also carry significant legal risks if not structured carefully. In this presentation, Gideon Korrell outlines eight critical legal risks businesses should assess before sharing technology with partners, from intellectual property protection and confidentiality to compliance, ownership rights, and dispute exposure, helping organizations collaborate strategically while safeguarding long-term value.
Gideon Korrell Shares 8 Legal Risks of Sharing Technology With Partners
Gideon
KShoarrerse 8l lLegal
Risks of Sharing
Technology With
Partners
Technology partnerships play a critical role in innovation, particularly in
engineering-driven and highly regulated industries. According to
Gideon Korrell, a lawyer with over 15 years of experience advising
businesses on contracts, technology transactions, and intellectual
property, many disputes arise not from bad intent, but from poorly
understood legal risks at the outset of collaboration.
1. Unclear
Intellectual
FPairlinog ptoe cleratrlyy dOefinwe onwenerrsshihp oifp
existing technology can result in
disputes over who controls core
assets. Ambiguity around background
intellectual property or jointly
developed outputs may lead to
unintended loss of rights or long-term
restrictions on use.
2. Inadequate
Confidentiality
Protections
Standard confidentiality agreements may
not sufficiently protect complex technical
information. If confidentiality obligations
are too narrow or poorly enforced,
sensitive know-how may be disclosed
beyond the intended scope, with limited
legal remedies available.
3. Undefined
Scope of
Permitted Use
When agreements do not precisely define
how shared technology may be used,
partners may apply it to unintended
products, markets, or regions. This can
undermine competitive advantage and
create conflicts over commercialization
rights.
4. Ownership of
Improvements and
Derivative Works
Collaborative projects often generate
improvements or modifications to the
original technology. Without clear
contractual provisions, disputes may arise
over whether enhancements belong to one
party, both parties, or are subject to
licensing.
5. Regulatory and
Export Control
EShxarpingo tescuhnriceal information in
regulated sectors may trigger compliance
obligations under export control, national
security, or industry-specific regulations.
Failure to account for these requirements
can result in enforcement actions and
operational delays.
6. Liability for
Misuse or Failure
If shared technology causes harm,
malfunctions, or regulatory violations,
liability may extend to the technology
owner. Poorly drafted liability and
indemnity clauses can leave
businesses exposed to claims arising
from a partner’s actions.
7. Termination
and Post-
Termination
Risks
Partnerships may end, but access to technology can persist if
exit provisions are unclear. Agreements should address post-
termination use, return or destruction of confidential materials,
and ongoing obligations.
8. Dispute
Resolution and
Enforcement
Technology-related disputes are often
Ccomhpalelxl aendn cgroses-sborder. Weak dispute
resolution clauses or unclear governing
law provisions can make enforcement
costly and time-consuming.
Thank
You
Comments