What is the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion
                     What is the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion? 
 
Drug testing can be a sensitive subject, but it becomes even more complex when legal terms 
like probable cause and reasonable suspicion are thrown into the mix. Let's break down these 
concepts and understand how they impact drug testing procedures. 
 
Probable Cause vs. Reasonable Suspicion 
 
Probable cause refers to a legal standard that requires there to be sufficient evidence or facts 
to support a belief that a person has engaged in criminal activity or is in possession of illegal 
drugs. 
For example, if an employer observes a person acting in a manner consistent with drug use or 
smells the odor of marijuana coming from a vehicle, this may be sufficient to establish probable 
cause for a drug test. 
Whereas, reasonable suspicion is a lower legal standard than probable cause and requires 
less evidence. It is the standard used by employers to justify drug testing in the workplace. 
Reasonable suspicion requires that there be specific and articulable facts that lead an employer 
to believe that an employee is using drugs or is under the influence of drugs while on the job.  
Examples of reasonable suspicion may include a decline in job performance, erratic behavior, 
or slurred speech. 
The key difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion is the level of evidence 
required to justify a drug test. Probable cause requires a higher level of evidence than reasonable 
suspicion and is typically used in criminal cases. Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard and 
is used in the workplace to help ensure a safe and productive work environment. 
 
Need help creating a safe workplace environment by conducting drug tests? We are here to help 
you with this. Visit goMDnow and discover our drug testing services.