Exact Open Group OG0-092 Real Exam Questions - OG0-092 Dumps PDF
                     The Open Group 
OG0-092 
TOGAF 9 Part 2 
https://www.realexamcollection.com/the-open-group/og0-092-dumps.html
 
Question: 1 
   
Scenario: Rollins Manufacturing  
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question 
Rollins Manufacturing is a major supplier in the automotive industry, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio with 
manufacturing plants in Chicago, Sao Paulo, Stuttgart, Yokohama, and Seoul. Each of these plants has been operating 
its own Manufacturing Requirements Planning (MRPII) system, production scheduling, and custom developed 
applications that drive the automated production equipment at each plant. 
Rollins is implementing lean manufacturing principles to minimize waste and improve the efficiency of all of its 
production operations. During a recent exercise held for internal quality improvement, it was determined that a 
significant reduction in process waste could be achieved by replacing the current MRPII and scheduling systems with 
a common Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system located in the Cleveland data center. This central system 
would provide support to each of the plants replacing the functionality in the existing systems. It would also 
eliminate the need for full data centers at each of the plant facilities. A reduced number of IT staff could support the 
remaining applications. In some cases, a third-party contractor could provide those staff. 
The Rollins Enterprise Architecture department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed 
architecture governance and development processes that are strongly based on TOGAF 9.At a recent meeting, the 
Architecture Review Board approved a Request for Architecture Work from the Chief Engineer of Global 
Manufacturing Operations who is the project sponsor. The request covered the initial architectural investigations 
and the development of a comprehensive architecture to plan the transformation. 
The Common ERP Deployment architecture project team has now been formed, and the project team has been 
asked to develop an Architecture Vision that will achieve the desired outcomes and benefits. Some of the plant 
managers have expressed concern about the security and reliability of driving their MRPII and production scheduling 
from a central system located in Cleveland. The Chief Engineer wants to know how these concerns can be addressed. 
Refer to the Rollins Manufacturing Scenario: 
You are serving as the Lead Enterprise Architect for the Common ERP Deployment architecture project. 
One of the earliest initiatives in the Enterprise Architecture program at Rollins was the definition of a set of IT 
principles and architecture principles that are well aligned with the overall enterprise principles. These now need to 
be updated to address the concerns raised. 
You have been asked to select a set of principles most appropriate for guiding the team to define a robust solution. 
[Note: You should assume that Rollins has adopted the example set of principles that are listed and defined in 
TOGAF 9, Section 23.6.] 
Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer? 
 
A. Common-use Applications, Data is Shared, Data is Accessible, Data is Secure, Interoperability, Control Technical 
Diversity. 
B. Business Continuity, Service-orientation, Data is Accessible, Data is Secure, Responsive Change Management. 
C. Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise, Business Continuity, Common-use Applications, Data is Shared, Data is 
Accessible, Data is Secure. 
D.  Information Management is Everybody's Business, IT Responsibility, Data Trustee, Technology Independence, 
Responsive Change Management. 
 
Answer: C     
 
Question: 2 
   
Scenario: Global Mobile 1 
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question 
Global Mobile is a mobile telecommunications company formed through a series of mergers and acquisitions. They 
are yet to fully integrate the customer service systems for the most recent acquisitions, and as result, customer 
service has been a major concern for the Chief Technology Officer. 
Results for the last two quarters have shown that Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) and the customer retention 
(Churn) rate have fallen below the industry average. The Corporate Marketing group has published some new 
findings about customer satisfaction. The customers appear to be switching to Air Light, a competitor, because of 
superior customer service. Global Mobile actually has better coverage in nearly all markets than Air Light, and good 
roaming agreements that keep rates low for business travelers. But, customer satisfaction has remained low. 
The Business Strategy group and the Enterprise Architecture group have conducted a high-level project to develop 
the enterprise-wide strategic plan. They have developed a business scenario which contains a good conceptual 
model of what needs to be done, and also identifies the key requirements. This was used in preparing the proposal 
presented to the Executive Council and the Corporate Board. 
The planning for the program has been underway for several months. Global Mobile has selected TOGAF 9 as the 
basis for its Enterprise Architecture. 
The Corporate Board has approved funding for a multi-million Euro conversion to transition to a packaged Customer 
Service System. It is anticipated that the overall program will take five years to complete, but there are some tactical 
projects that can commence immediately to address the situation. The Corporate Board has placed one additional 
major constraint on the program. In addition to achieving the business outcomes directly related to improving 
overall customer service within each business unit, the Corporate Board expects the Target Architecture to produce 
an additional saving of at least 30% over current operating costs through energy efficiency initiatives, virtualization 
of servers and workstations, and expanded telecommuting and desk-sharing. This Green initiative is intended to 
become a model for future investments at all company facilities worldwide. 
Refer to Global Mobile scenario 
You have been engaged as a consultant to advise the Chief Architect on the best ways to approach to the 
implementation planning activities for this significant business transformation. 
Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer? (Is this the right answers to choose?)  
 
A. You recommend using conventional implementation planning techniques. The horizontal scope of the Green 
initiative would make the Capability-Based Planning approach used in the organization's TOGAF-based Enterprise 
Architecture framework difficult to manage and govern. This approach to planning was better applied within the 
vertical scope of a business unit. 
B. You recommend that the implementation planning activities be conducted using Capability-Based Planning. This is 
appropriate because the Green initiative is an enterprise-wide plan with a horizontal scope. Its metrics are 
aggregated at the enterprise level. It is crucial to gain business unit support and cooperation to achieve the broader 
business outcomes which will benefit all. 
C. The Capability-Based Planning approach used in the organization's TOGAF-based Enterprise Architecture 
framework is focused on business outcomes. The Green initiative is an infrastructure program that is technical in 
nature; therefore, it would not be appropriate to use the Capability-Based Planning approach. Instead, the Global 
Mobile systems development lifecycle approach should be utilized to develop the Solution Architecture. 
D. You recommend using conventional implementation planning techniques. The Capability-Based Planning 
approach is normally only used in public sector, defense-related programs. This approach is not appropriate for a 
private sector company. 
 
Answer: B     
 
Question: 3 
   
Scenario: AGEX Inc. 
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question 
AGEX is a large, global commodities trading company which has been growing rapidly through a series of 
acquisitions. 
Each new business is performing well in its markets. However, the lack of integration between headquarters and the 
business units has increasingly caused problems in the handling of customer and financial information. The inability 
to share information across businesses has resulted in lost opportunities to "leverage the synergies" that had been 
intended when the businesses were acquired. At present, each business unit maintains its own applications. Despite 
an earlier initiative to install a common application to manage customer, products, supplier, and inventory 
information, each business unit has different ways of defining each of these core elements and has customized the 
common application to the point where the ability to exchange information is difficult, costly, and error-prone. 
As a result, AGEX has begun implementing a single Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system to consolidate 
information from several applications that exist across the lines of business. The Corporate Board is concerned that 
the new ERP system must be able to manage and safeguard customer information in a manner that meets or 
exceeds the legal requirements of the countries in which the company operates. This will be an increasingly 
important capability as the company expands its online services offered to clients and trading partners. 
The CIO has formed an Enterprise Architecture department, and one of the primary goals in its charter is to 
coordinate efforts between the ERP implementation team and the business unit personnel who will be involved in 
the migration process. The CIO has also formed a cross-functional Architecture Review Board to oversee and govern 
the architecture. 
After reviewing the available alternatives, and based on recommendations from the ERP vendor, AGEX has selected 
TOGAF 9 as the basis for its Enterprise Architecture program. 
The CIO has endorsed this choice with the full support of top management. 
Refer to the AGEX Inc. Scenario 
You are serving as the Chief Architect. 
You have been asked to recommend the approach to take in the Preliminary Phase to ensure that the Corporate 
Board's concern is addressed. 
Based en TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer? 
 
A. You evaluate the implications of the Board's concern in terms of regulatory and security policy requirements. You 
then update the AGEX security policy to reflect the concern, ensuring that this policy is communicated across the 
organization. 
You allocate a security architecture team to ensure that security considerations are included in ongoing architecture 
planning. You then assess the security implications and agreements within the AGEX businesses and their suppliers. 
B. You evaluate the implications of the Board's concern in terms of regulatory requirements and their impact on 
business goals and objectives. Based on this understanding, you then issue a Request for Architecture Work to 
commence an architecture development project to develop a solution that will address the Board's concern. 
You allocate a security architect to oversee the implementation of the solution in the ERP system that is being 
developed. 
C. You start by clarifying the intent that the Board has for raising this concern. This enables you to understand the 
implications of the concern in terms of regulatory requirements and the potential impact on current business goals 
and objectives. 
You propose that a security architect or security architecture team be allocated to develop comprehensive security 
architecture. 
D. You evaluate the implications of the Board's concern by examining the potential impacts on business goals and 
objectives. Based on your understanding, you then update the current AGEX security policy to include an emphasis 
on the Board's concern. 
In addition, you allocate a security architect to ensure that security considerations are included in the architecture 
planning for all domains. 
 
Answer: A     
 
Question: 4 
   
Scenario: Zephyr Enterprises 
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question 
Zephyr Enterprises specializes in the development of wind turbine blades for use in large-scale commercial wind 
energy production systems. Zephyr has manufacturing facilities located in Palm Springs, California, Omaha, 
Nebraska, and Winnipeg, Ontario. Each of these plants supplies a different manufacturer that builds and sells 
complete systems. The turbine blades are custom engineered to meet each manufacturers design specifications. 
Until recently, most turbine blades were fabricated manually using molded fiber-reinforced plastics. However, recent 
improvements in composite materials, coupled with enhanced automated methods for precision application of 
materials during the molding process, have led to significant reduction in weight, increase in strength, and greatly 
improved blade longevity. Zephyr has pioneered the development of a proprietary automated process for 
continuous extrusion of the turbine blades. Patents have been filed to protect the process, but certain trade secrets 
must be closely guarded. 
Zephyr has a mature Enterprise Architecture organization that is supported by a cross-functional Architecture 
Review Board. The Chief Information Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture 
program. 
Zephyr has used TOGAF and its Architecture Development Method (ADM) to develop its automated manufacturing 
processes and systems that are used to design, manufacture, and test the blade assemblies. They have recently 
updated to TOGAF 9 and have adapted the Zephyr Enterprise Architecture to closely follow the TOGAF 9 framework. 
All of Zephyrs IT architects have been trained and certified on TOGAF 9.Recently, an architecture project was 
completed that defined a standard approach for controlling the Automated Test System that is used at each plant to 
perform final quality assurance tests on each completed blade assembly. The Manufacturing Architecture Board 
approved the plan for immediate implementation at each plant. 
An Architecture Contract was developed that detailed the work needed to implement and deploy the new 
Automated Test System controller. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, has expressed concern that a uniform 
process be employed at each site to ensure consistency. 
Refer to the Zephyr Enterprises Scenario 
You are the Lead Architect for this activity. 
You have been asked to recommend the best approach to adopt to address the Chief Engineer's concern. 
Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer? 
 
A. You create an Architecture Contract to manage and govern the implementation and migration process. If the 
contract is issued to an external party, you ensure that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. For internal 
development projects, you decide it is adequate to utilize a memorandum of understanding between the 
Manufacturing Architecture Board and the implementation organization. 
You recommend that if a deviation from the contract is detected, the Manufacturing Architecture Board should 
modify the Architecture Contract to allow the implementation organization the ability to customize the process to 
meet their local needs. As a result, you then issue a new Request for Architecture Work to implement the modified 
Architecture Definition. 
B. You create an Architecture Contract to manage and govern the implementation and migration process. If the 
contract is issued to an external party, you ensure that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. For internal 
envelopment projects, you decide it is adequate to utilize a memorandum of understanding between the 
Manufacturing Architecture Board and the implementation organization. 
You recommend that if a deviation from the Architecture Contract is detected, the Manufacturing Architecture 
Board grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization the ability to customize the process to meet 
their local needs. 
C. You create an Architecture Contract to manage and govern the implementation and migration process. If the 
contract is issued to an external party, you ensure that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. For internal 
development projects, you decide it is adequate to utilize a memorandum of understanding between the 
Manufacturing Architecture Board and the implementation organization. 
You ensure that the Manufacturing Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract, and 
considers whether or not to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process 
to meet their local needs. 
D. You create an Architecture Contract to govern the implementation and migration process at each site. If the 
contract is issued to an external party, you ensure that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You ensure that the 
contract addresses the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. 
You then schedule compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process to ensure that the work is 
proceeding in accordance with the Architecture Definition. Based on the results, you ensure that the Manufacturing 
Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract, and considers whether or not to grant a 
dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs. 
 
Answer: C     
 
Question: 5 
   
Scenario: Vittronics Ltd. 
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question 
Vittronics Ltd. is a leading medical device manufacturer in the highly competitive market for Migraine Headache Pain 
Management (MHPM) devices. These tiny wireless devices are implanted in the brain and can deliver a precise 
electric shock when the wearable Pain Control Unit (PCU) detects an increase in stress induced by the onset of a 
migraine headache. 
This technology will be a breakthrough in the treatment of this condition, and several competitors are striving to be 
the first to introduce a product into the market. However, all of them must demonstrate the effectiveness and safety 
of their products in a set of clinical trials that will satisfy the regulatory requirements of the countries in the target 
markets. 
The Enterprise Architecture group at Vittronics has been engaged in an architecture development project to create a 
Secure Private Immersive Collaborative Environment (SPICE) that will allow researchers at its product development 
laboratories worldwide to share information about their independent clinical trials. 
The Vittronics Enterprise Architecture group is a mature organization that has been utilizing TOGAF for several years. 
They have recently upgraded to TOGAF 9. The Vittronics Architecture Development Method (VADM) is strictly based 
on the TOGAF 9 Architecture Development Method (ADM) with extensions required to support current good 
manufacturing practices and good laboratory practices in their target markets. 
The SPICE project team has now completed the Business, Information Systems, and Technology Architecture phases 
and has produced a complete set of deliverables for each phase. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the 
information that is managed in SPICE, special care was taken to ensure that each architecture domain included an 
examination of the security and privacy issues that are relevant for each domain. A corresponding SPICE Security 
Architecture has been defined. 
The Executive Vice President for Clinical Research is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture activity. 
Refer to the Vittronics Ltd Scenario: 
You are serving as the Lead Architect for the SPICE project team. 
As required by TOGAF, the SPICE project team res completed a Business Transformation Readiness Assessment in 
Phase A (Architecture Vision). In that assessment, it was determined that there are risks associated with the 
adoption of the Immersive Collaborative Environment. Despite a clear expression of the vision and the business need 
for utilizing SPICE to accelerate the clinical trials, the researchers have been resisting the change because of concerns 
about safeguarding individually identifiable information about the subjects who were participating in the trials. 
You have been asked to recommend how this situation be managed in the implementation planning phases. 
Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer? 
 
A. You decide that in Phase E, the team creates an overall solutions strategy that can guide the Target Architecture 
implementation and structure the Transition Architectures. You check that there is consensus before proceeding. 
B. You decide to return to Phase A, where the team should brainstorm a technical solution that mitigates the 
residual risks presented by the privacy issue. Then, during Phase D, you will direct the team to develop an 
Architecture Building Block to manage the security risks. After that, the team should select Solution Building Blocks 
that mitigate all of the identified risks and revise the Requirements Impact Statement to reflect the changes to the 
high-level solutions strategy and migration plan. 
C. You decide that in Phase E, the team review the Business Transformation Readiness Assessment and identify, 
classify, and mitigate the risks associated with the identified readiness factors. If the risks can be satisfactorily 
mitigated, then you would continue to define a high-level solutions strategy that includes the Transition 
Architectures needed to make the change culturally and technically feasible. 
D. You decide that in Phase E, the team determines an approach to implementing an overall strategic direction that 
will address and mitigate the risks identified. 
 
Answer: B     
 
https://www.realexamcollection.com/the-open-group/og0-092-dumps.html