most expensive Hollywood movies ever made
                      MOST EXPENSIVE 
HOLLYWOOD MOVIES 
EVER MADE
1. Privateers of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011) 
• Chief: Rob Marshall
• Cost of generation: $397 million USD
• In spite of the truly pleasant film industry returns, Pirates of the Caribbean: 
On Stranger Tides was no shabby date. 2007 and 2006's Gore Verbinski-
coordinated Dead Man's Chest and At World's End cost $263 million and $341 
million, individually, with On Stranger Tides getting a space as the most 
costly long shot – with Jack Sparrow and Barbossa's mission to locate the 
subtle wellspring of youth costing about $400 million. 
• Despite the colossal creation costs (Depp's installment was an expected 
$55,000,000… Well, hello, somebody needs to pay for that decorating) the 
movies busting Pirates of the Caribbean flicks have been the most 
uncommon money cow, and since the first occasion when we saw Johnny 
Depp strutting around with beaded fears and fellow liner in 2003, the Disney 
executives behind the establishment have been at the same time swimming 
around in gold up to their armpits.
                                                                                                          pinterest
2. Waterworld (1995) 
• Chief: Kevin Reynolds 
• Cost of generation: $271 million USD 
• Kevin Costner lived on a trimaran amidst the sea, that was once Earth before 
all the ice tops softened and dry land turned into ancient history… Much like 
Hollywood blockbusters that cost under $200 million USD. The Costner-
featuring flick of 1995 was the most costly motion picture at any point 
created, at the time. Costner contributed over $20 million of his own assets 
into the film for which shooting occurred on board a massive 400-foot 
measurement atoll, explicitly worked for the generation some place off the 
shoreline of Hawaii. The dynamite, 1000-ton drifting set – over a fourth of a 
mile in boundary – likewise gulped a great deal of the motion picture's 
spending given that it required flying shooting by means of seaplanes and 
helicopters. Also the way that whoever was on climate post obligation at the 
time bombed terrifically in their activity – the verification for which came as 
three enormous storms that sank the whole set. 
• In spite of Waterworld's cutting edge setting, pundits were all things 
considered neutral by the wet exhibitions. Truth be told, it's likely the most 
renowned lemon in ongoing film history; the dystopian motion picture took 
just $88 million at the US film industry, in spite of it's insane creation spend. 
                                                                                                          pinterest
3. John Carter (2012) 
• Chief: Andrew Stanton 
• Cost of generation: $263 million USD 
• The expense of John Carter was – with no better method to state it – silly. It 
left Disney some place around $200 million out of pocket, making it the 
organization's greatest lemon ever. The individual expense of the film 
likewise wasn't so little. Rich Ross – the previous executive of Walt Disney 
Studios – chose to leave only a month after the film was discharged, while 
Disney lost the rights to create the remainder of Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc's 
back list in the wake of declining to deliver any John Carter continuations 
(Disney most likely had the correct thought on that one… ). 
• Likewise, executive Stanton started shooting the film with Taylor Kitsch as the 
eponymous lead. In any case, because of different issues in after generation, 
Stanton was compelled to shoot a significant part of the film twice – which, 
obviously – before long observed the spending winding wild. Truth be told, 
John Carter would've needed to make some place around $600 million just to 
make back the initial investment. It didn't approach. Poor Stanton… Nobody 
needs to find their own restrictions on such a worldwide stage.
                                                                                                          pinterest
4. Tangled (2010) 
• Executive: Nathan Greno, Byron Howard 
• Cost of creation: $260 million USD 
• Tangled was so costly mostly in light of to what extent it took to get the story 
right. It took around ten years of numerous prematurely ended endeavors at 
the film, every one of which got entirely far in before they rejected 
everything and began once more. A significant part of the financial backing 
included updating adaptations of already endeavored flick Rapunzel, going 
back to 2000, that were never created. In addition, broad research was done 
to build up the activity procedure that enabled the CGI to bring out a portion 
of the characteristics of conventional hand-drawn Disney characters – 
quickening the majority of that blonde hair must've been an incredible 
difficulty. 
• An engaging if rather forgettable Disney activity that not the slightest bit 
earned its gigantic spending plan, Tangled inevitably packed away a benefit 
when it was discharged in worldwide theaters, however it's still beautiful 
astounding how a lot of money they spent on this one. 
                                                                                                          pinterest
5. Spider-Man 3  (2007) 
• Executive: Sam Raimi
• Cost of creation: $258 million USD 
• At the point when Spider-Man was discharged in 2002, it without any help 
laid the foundation for the current superhuman blast. In any case, at that 
point they just began tossing cash at the establishment… And tragically, 
making costly, leader superhuman continuations is no little or basic 
accomplishment. Creation for the motion picture delayed into pre-fall where 
it had been booked to finish up in June, pushing up the expenses drastically. 
What's more, there was the enormous expense of CGI, the web-throwing set 
pieces, the star pay rates and – obviously – the showcasing and 
advancement crusade costs. 
• After Spidey 2 experienced considerable difficulties persuading fans that a 
maturing 8-legged creature fan was all the while living in a solitary bedsit 
and flying round to his Aunt May's home for some home-cooking before 
moving into the old red-blue Spandex throughout the night, the studio most 
likely didn't have a lot of a decision on the incredible showcasing spending 
plan. What's more, sadly, in spite of Spider-Man 2 costing $250 million to 
deliver and Spider-Man 3 considerably more, the basic gathering simply 
didn't satisfy. 
                                                                                                          pinterest
THANK YOU