Uploaded on Oct 12, 2019
DFG Champions Oct 19
DFG Roadshow 19
Conflicts &
Friendships
A Relationship Perspective
DFG Roadshow Oct 2019
National Body for Home Improvement Agencies
Improving Delivery of the Disabled Facilities Grant
DFG is
Process Heavy OT
Assessor
OT responsible for
establishing clinical
need.
GO responsible for
protecting the public
purse LA
HIA CW responsible HIA
for advocating on
Facilitator GObehalf of the client
Enforcer
Split Legal responsibilities
Housing authorities have the mandatory duty for
Cost-Benefit the DFG Social Care has duties to older & disabled
Conflicts people & disabled children. Health has a duty to respond all at the point of
need
Public Housing
Health Health Planning
Social DFG
Care Costs and benefits split: Capital costs - Central Govt and
3rd Housing Authorities
sector Revenue costs - Housing
Services and budgets split: Authorities and Social Care
DFG, Community Equipment, Sensory Impairment, Overall benefits - Health and Social
Assistive Tech, Repairs, Wheelchairs. Care
Overly complex for customers & professionals
Commissioner Hierarchical, transactional
-Contractor leadership
Tensions
Essentially Parent/Child relationship
Referee and fixer of disputes
Multiple contracts to monitor
Output not outcome drive
Process costs/micro management
stifles change & innovation
Risk are unfairly distributed
Quality VS Cost trade-offs.
OT
HIA LA CustomersGO
Public
Health HousingHealth
Social DFG Customers
Care
Costs of
conflict 1700 FTEs costing £76.5M (15% or 17% with man costs) Local Government Ombudsman activities
120-150 statements/year
1% but 50% higher than £1 spent on other
council services
10 times more likely per household (0.3% vs 0.04%)
Significant levels of work related stress
High in Health, Social care & local government
1/3 of all ill health at work
Leading to average 31 day sickness
Sclerotic processes
Let’s Pull Shared Commitment to
Together! Integrated Care & Support
(2013)
Care Act Duty to Collaborate
Better Care Fund (2014)
National Memorandum of
Understanding on Health &
Housing (2015 & 2018)
Collaborative HIA (2016)
A new way
to engage?
Collaborative
Co-produced
Person-centred
An Provides a vehicle to share
Alliance risks, responsibilities & opportunities
Provides a way of working
based on alignment around
outcomes and commitment to
principles & behaviours
Not a legal entity as Alliance
participants retain their own
identity & internal controls.
Alliance Contract
Traditional contract Alliance
Alliance Governance Arrangements
Contract Risk-sharingRewards
Structure Performance
Alliance Contract
One contract, one between all
performance framework parties
Contract sets out agreed
outcomes and
relationships
Strong Relationships &
Trust
Aligned objectives, shared
risks P
Shared Responsibility P1 2 P3 P4 P5
drives improvement
Success judged on Alliance Participants
performance overall
Decisions are made
against principles
Collective
responsibility
for all risks
Act
according to ‘Best for
Alliance Service’
values & Decisions
Behaviours
Alliance
Principles Alliance Unanimous Appoint on decisions on
best person all key
basis issues
Open Book ‘ No Fault,
Accounting & No Blame ‘
Transparency Culture
Alignment of Goals:
Organisational Will achievement of Alliance Goals lead
Alignment to achievement of our own Goals?
Alignment of Drivers:
Will our own strategic objectives be met
by being a member of the Alliance?
Alignment of Commitment:
Are we prepared to make collective
decisions & play our part in
implementing them?
Alignment of Governance:
Does the decision making, policy setting
& assurance role of the Alliance fit with
our own governance?
Integrated
Governance Commissioner
Commissioner as Owner
Sets mandate, outcomes, risk-strategy.
Focus on system & Behavioural leadership
Alliance Leadership Team (ALT)
Alliance Leadership Team
Senior members (including commissioner)
with authority to commit on behalf of their Alliance Management Team (AMT)
organisations; One Leadership Forum to led by Alliance Manager
replace contract monitoring
Wider Integrated Team
Alliance Management Team
Key people with subject expertise from each
of the participating organisations P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery
Teams Teams Teams Teams Teams
Alliance Manager
Runs the alliance (‘go to’ person or CEO)
14
Collaboration
is….
Making decisions
together
Implementing
those decisions
Being jointly
accountable the
results
Drives Collaboration & Innovation
Alliance Values Different Perspectives & diversity of provision
Contracting Democratic and equal: Everyone has
a say, decision making is shared
Single Risk Sharing Contract
Integrated governance; principle based
decision making
Performance Framework focused on
whole system outcomes
Financial risk share through gainshare
& pain-share mechanism
Alliance
Contracting The Targeted Prevention Alliance
Stockport
A little closer to 6 Community & Housing
Home organisations
The Lambeth Living Well
Collaborative
2 Charities, Foundations Trust &
ASC
Conclusions Risk (and opportunity) share not
risk allocation
“we thought we The collective dynamic of several
were good at interdependent features is unique
partnerships. Now to alliancing
we are working in
an alliance we Collaborative leadership skills
realise we hadn’t needed – from commissioners
especially
really collaborated
before” Build relationships strong enough
to have hard conversations
Alliance Logic Chain
Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impacts
Switch Alliance Alliance Greater Fewer conflicts,
Resource strategy Principles, number of complaints &
from contract Governance Values & people stress.
management structure Behaviour helped to Greater
to service Alliance Organisational stay well at Systemic
improvement members Alignment home. Resilience
Alliance Financial Reduced Better
agreement framework Financial Communities
Risks
Interested in Exploring Alliancing?
[email protected]
Dr Linda Hutchinson LH Alliances: http://lhalliances.org.uk/
Comments