How Effectively Peer-Reviewing Influence Journal Acceptance? Mention the Basic Tenets of Peer-Reviewing - Phdassistance.com
                     H O W E F F E C T IV E L Y P E E R - 
 R E V I E W I N G I N F L U E N C E   
J O U R N A L A C C E P T A N C E
ME N T IO N T H E B A S IC T E N T S O F  
 P E E R - R E V I E W I N G
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, 
Phdassistance  Group www.phdassistance.com
Email: [email protected]
TODAY'S 
DISCUSSION
Outline In-
Brief
Introduction
Importance of Peer 
Review  Peer-Review 
Process
Basic Tenets of Peer-
Reviewing  Conclusion
In-Brief
PhD peer review process is similar for all journals. Once author submits a  
manuscript, it is initially reviewed by the journal editor to determine its relevance  
according to the guidelines set by the editorial policy. Most of the journals use  
some form of a checklist for the reviewer to critically analyze the submitted article.
PhD Manuscript Peer Reviewing process generally does not change the  
fundamental nature of the submitted manuscript; instead, it assists the authors to 
 improve the presentation and format of their work.
Int roduct ion
The PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer 
Review  process ensures the research findings 
are valid  and reliable.
The manuscript can not withstand scientific  
knowledge without an effective peer review process.
Without the process, the result may include
dissemination of false or flawed knowledge.
Contd..
It hardly takes about 10 to 12 weeks for publishing the manuscript in the scientific 
 journal of which most of the time consumed by the peer-review process.
Manuscript Peer Review a Guide helps to know about the reviewers to look for 
 various aspects in the manuscript and look for the content that deems the  
necessary things for publication.
Importance 
To select the quality article for publication and filter the 
 of Peer   study that conceived, designed, executed with the  
Review following selection method,
The validity of the research article and the methodology
To check the precision of the result obtained whether 
 supports the conclusion
To check the relevance of the article
To check the structure and format of the article
Contd..
PhD Dissertation Peer Reviewing Services to check against misconduct 
 within the article
 PhD Manuscript Peer Review Process provides editors with the evidence 
to  decide whether the articles meet the selection criteria of the journal
Peer-Review 
The Peer review of the thesis is the critical process to 
 Process  ensure the quality and the integrity of the research.
It is the process where researchers ask help to their  
expertise in their field to assess the article and check for 
 its accuracy and rigour to help that the article builds 
or  adds the current literature.
Manuscript Writing Help not only helps to maintain the 
 quality and integrity of the literature in the manuscript.
It's key things that effectively develop your article.
Contd..
It is the way to keep abreast of current research, to impress journals to 
 select the document submitted.
Manuscript Peer review process helps you to review a manuscript, and spot 
 common flaws in research papers, and improve your chances of being  
published author.

Basic  
Four basic tenets involved in the Peer Review Service for PhD 
Tenets of   Manuscripts,
Peer-  
 DECLINE THE REVIEW IF YOU HAVE CONFLICT 
Reviewin INTEREST 
g The journal accepts High-value articles by standard form 
 for separating the fact.
For this particular reason, every researcher should conduct 
 their work ethically by avoiding conflicts of interest.
From conducting experiments to writing manuscripts and  
undergoing peer review, researchers must maintain a good 
 account in their work.
Contd..
PhD peer reviewing services editors seek out experts in the field to review the 
 manuscript and add the comment.
There are rules for reviewers to avoid conflicts as well as simple rules for writing that 
 help authors be clear regarding authorship and sponsorship.
 REMEMBER YOU'RE ADVISING THE JOURNAL EDITOR, NOT DECIDING ON
 WHETHER TO ACCEPT OR REJECT.
The reviewer acts as the advisor to the journal editor.
When writing a review, one should describe the reason for the recommendation so 
 the editor can make an informed decision.
Contd..
It is more important to comment on the academic content of the paper than on 
 grammar and punctuation mistakes found in the paper.
However, if the language is too poor and if it is difficult to read the contents 
 adequately, then alert the journal editor.
 TRY TO BE HELPFUL TO THE AUTHOR
The review we make will be sent to the author of the paper.
So, the reviewers are in a strong position to guide the author on how the 
manuscript
can be in the standard format.
Contd..
While recommending acceptance or rejections, then the author can be beneficial
from your review.
The review should intently help the author to make a better decision to make the 
 paper in the standard format.
Peer review should be collegial and respectful.
 MAINTAIN CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE PAPER
Reviewer revises the paper with the great understanding of the concept that they 
 are handling.
Contd..
And this must be highly confidential as such they should not discuss the
review or disclose any of the content in the paper to other third parties.
The reviewer should not use their interest to develop the study further using 
 their knowledge.
Conclusio
Most of the reputed journal accepts the paper that is peer 
n  reviewed.
The increased use of the manuscript peer review is due to 
 two main factors:
The proliferation of the document is the primary reason to 
 do peer review.
The next reason is the explosion of new information in the 
 field of study.
PhD Manuscript Writing Peer review service experts help 
 you to evade the significant errors that decrease the  
quality of the manuscript.
Contact 
Us
UNITED KINGDOM
+44-1143520021
INDIA
+91-4448137070
EMAIL
[email protected]