How to Perform a Peer Review? Give a Step by Step Procedure for New Researchers in Reviewing The Manuscript - Phdassistance.com
                     HOW TO PERFORM A PEER 
GRIEVVE IAE SWTEP BY STEP PROCEDURE 
FOR  NEW RESEARCHERS IN
REVIEWING THE MANUSCRIPT
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, 
Phdassistance  Group
www.phdassistance.com
Email: [email protected]
TODAY'S 
DISCUSSION
Outline
In-Brief Concluding the first reading
Introduction Rejection after the first 
Overview of the Report reading  To save time and 
Format  First Read-Through review
What are the considerations in the first CCaornrcyl uosuito nthe second review
read  Spotting potential major flaws
In-Brief
PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer Review allows the students writing to clarify their 
 ideas in the content. PhD peer reviewing services exists to validate academic work  
and helps to increases networking possibilities within research communities by
improving the quality of published research. Making the writing process collaborative 
 through peer review helps students to gain experience to learn from one side and to 
 think carefully about the research writing.
Int roduct ion
Peer review is the process that involves various  
aspects in the manuscript that deem the necessary 
 element for publication.
The PhD peer-review process ensures the manuscript 
 is easy to comprehend, do not have any gaps.
Manuscript Writing Help determines the reliability and 
 validity of research findings.
The reviewer should check for scientific merits its 
 methods and research misconduct.
Overview 
 of the  
The structuring of the report varies based on the 
Report   journal.
Format
Some follow the informal structure, while others 
 have a formal approach.
PhD Manuscript Peer Review Process carried out 
 based on the journal submission guidelines and 
the  requirements of the researchers.
Informal  
St ructur Most of the journals do not provide strict criteria for 
e  submission.
In this case, you have a look at the other articles
published in the journal to get an idea of structuring.
So, you should gain some knowledge about  
structuring to rely on your evolving style or get help 
 from PhD Manuscript Peer Reviewing experts to  
have a quality document.
Formal  
Other journals require a formal approach and follow 
Structur  strict submission guidelines.
e
It is an important stage when there is a presence of 
 submission guidelines because they will ask you 
to  address a specific format to research 
questions.
You need to go on your own to check the submission 
 guidelines.
So when you want to submit your paper to the specific 
 journal, there are formal guidelines, and that directs 
 the structure of your review.
First Read- 
 Through
The first read-through is the skim read which will help  
you to form an initial impression of the paper and get  
the sense of what is an eventual recommendation made 
 in the paper that decides the acceptance or rejection.
Professional Pre-Submission Peer Review Help you to 
 work with the rejected document and gain strength to  
paper for publication.
What are  Peer Review Service for Manuscripts check for the  
central question addressed in writing is relevant to the 
the   study and interesting.
Considerat
Peer review of the thesis is to evaluate the topic novelty 
 and check for what it does add to the subject area  
-ions in compared with other published material.
the  First Check whether the conclusions consist of evidence and  
Read argument from standard articles and also check for the 
 relevance.
Do this paper include tables, figures and to check 
 whether they add significance to the paper.
Contd..

Spotting  
Potent ial It was all about spotting the major flaws that 
 Major   decrease the quality of the document.
Flaws
Check for mistakes in the methodology part, 
 which is the main part of the whole writing.
Check for the information gathered whether this 
 information provides enough knowledge to 
the  readers.
Contd..
 Manuscript Peer Review a Guide check if there is a presence of a critical flaw in 
the
manuscript and help yo correct it on the early stage, flaws such as,
Insufficient data
Statistically non-significant variants 
 Unclear data tables and structures
Data that disagree with your conclusion  
Including data that adds arguments little weak
Concludin
After completing the initial reads, consider all those
g  the First major flaws you found.
 Reading
Write a rough draft of paragraph you came to  
known from evaluating the paper make the rough 
 draft as two paragraphs.
First summarises the research question, second 
 address the contribution of work.
It will be helpful if the journal has prescribed the
report format.
Contd..
It helps to draft to compose your thoughts.
After reviewing the manuscript, you have to decide whether the manuscript
is seriously flawed or it is publishable.
Reject io
n  after 
If you come to an opinion that the article has  
the  First serious flaws, make sure you read the whole 
 Reading  content.
It is mandatory because you may find some 
 positive aspect that communicated with  
other authors.
That could help you with future 
submission.
To Save  
Time and While writing does not rely on uninteresting comment on 
 the manuscript document.
 Review
Try to the group based on the requirement.
Check whether the line number text upon, this will help 
 you define items again and also aids your review.
Do keep images, graph and tables in a clear view 
while
writing itself. It will help you evaluate easily.
Carry Out  
One of the reasons for the rejection of the M anuscrip
the Second t  b y the Journal is a language issue.
 Review
Not every submission is well written in the right format.
If the article is difficult to understand, you should work 
1. Check the  with the document.
 
Language However, if the language is poor but the central
message is delivered well see if you can improve the 
 document and fix the problem immediately.
Contd..
2. Go through 
 Section by 
 Section Check whether the cited article is central to the 
 author's argument.
It will help you to find errors from different areas 
 than before.
There is a need to check to reference for accuracy, 
 adequacy and balance.
Contd..
3. How to  
Structure  If you are writing a formal report, remember to follow 
your Report  the guidelines.
It will always comprise of a range of questions followed 
 by comments.
If you're following an informal report format, you  
could structure your report in three sections: summary, 
 major issues, minor issues.
Conclusio
n
 PhD Manuscript Writing Peer review provides 
a  professional experience for students 
writing.
Peer review is needed to minimize last-minute 
 drafting and to cut down common lower-level  
writing errors.
Contact 
Us
UNITED KINGDOM
+44-1143520021
INDIA
+91-4448137070
EMAIL
[email protected]