Enterprise Architecture & Solution Architecture- Traverse the Gap (2)
                     ENTERPRISE 
ARCHITECTURE & 
SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE- 
TRAVERSE THE GAP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•   Overview
•   Business Architecture In-Accordance with the Business Users and Business 
Analysts
•   Identifying Design Patterns for Every Service
•   Assessment of Multiple Options with Solution Architecture Analyses
•   Decoding the Solution Architecture and Its Benefits to Decision-Makers
•   Evaluating the Implementation and Bracketing Compliance Gaps
•   Demonstrating the Gaps Concerning Business Impact 
•   The Closure
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE IN-
ACCORDANCE WITH THE 
BUSINESS USERS AND 
BUSINESS ANALYSTS
The initial stage involves developing an 
architecture concept to model the business, 
encompassing various roles, processes, and 
services. This allows architects to engage with 
the business and gain insight into user 
requirements. Presenting the model to 
business users facilitates discussion and 
enhances understanding of the designed 
systems.
IDENTIFYING DESIGN 
PATTERNS FOR EVERY 
SERVICE
Architecture optimizes resource use through 
contracted services and SLAs. ESB deployment 
controls the system landscape, providing 
necessary SOA services on a secure platform. 
Integration patterns ensure reusability and 
prevent overlap. The ESB offers orchestration, 
monitoring, management, communication, 
transformation, mediation, and integration 
capabilities.
ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLE OPTIONS 
WITH SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE 
ANALYSES
After understanding the business needs and 
aligning with the architect's vision, the 
application architecture is modeled. The 
architect considers user requirements, the 
developed business model, reusable services, 
policies, patterns, security, and operational 
needs. Multiple realistic solution architectures 
are generated and evaluated, taking into 
account cost implications for each decision.
DECODING THE SOLUTION 
ARCHITECTURE AND ITS BENEFITS TO 
DECISION-MAKERS
The exercise outcome should be reported 
concisely, focusing on the key findings & 
actionable decisions derived from assessing risks, 
opportunities, & costs. The architect must create 
a comprehensive document, leaving no 
uncertainties or assumptions, with support from 
experts in the field. The report should present 
factual information, highlighting the impact of 
decisions on quality factors, while shareholders 
determine the optimal trade-off between system 
performance, security, and cost.
EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION 
AND BRACKETING COMPLIANCE GAPS
During system implementation, it's common to 
realize that the original architecture is unsuitable 
due to changing prerequisites, limitations, or 
negligence. Deviations from the plan can have 
significant consequences. The architect should 
promptly communicate goals to stakeholders and 
obtain formal acceptance to ensure the intended 
system is implemented. Performing a gap analysis 
helps prevent shortcuts and ensures the project 
stays within schedule and budget.
DEMONSTRATING THE GAPS 
CONCERNING BUSINESS IMPACT
1. Translate business impact gaps.
2. Identify root causes in non-technical terms.
3. Present cost-effective alleviating measures.
4. Inform impacted stakeholders.
5. Seek stakeholder acceptance or rejection to void 
   compromising the SOA.
THE CLOSURE
Enterprise architects have broader responsibilities than 
solution architects, focusing on the overall organization 
rather than specific solutions. Solution architects, on the 
other hand, concentrate on individual applications. 
Organizational challenges arise due to conflicting 
stakeholder requirements, requiring transparent and 
neutral architecture. For the best architectural solution 
and software integration, choose Smartinfologiks—a 
dedicated specialist in rebuilding legacy software and 
making strategic technological decisions.
CONTACT 
INFORMATION
+91 
[email protected]
www.smartinfologiks.com