Relationship Between Agile Testing and Software Development
                     Software Testing Companies: Relationship 
Between Agile Testing and Software 
Development
When developing a software project, it is necessary to assure that the software meets the 
quality needs that a customer demands. Software testing companies ensures the criteria that 
were agreed when the software was built are fulfilled. We have to be sure there are no bugs, 
errors, or any other element that could lead to software failure.
The idea of QA originates from a commitment to deliver a quality product. Every 
   d  e  v elopment organization should have someone accountable for assuring the right operation 
of the software being developed.
Throughout the years, an expanding number of software testing companies in the UK are 
embracing the agile methodology, being developed as well as in testing also.
What is Agile Testing?
Agile testing is the method of testing software based on the agile methodology of software 
development. Here, testing is supposed to be an integral part of the software development 
method rather than a standalone phase. Development and testing go side by side and are 
carried out in repetitions with frequent checkpoints to assure the product is in tune with the 
contemporary customer expectations.
How can agile software testing companies benefit your business?
Discovering defects at early stages: Testing is started as soon as the code is in decent shape. 
This helps in early detection of errors. Typically, about 47% of errors can be discovered to 
demands and another 28% to design, and the cost of fixing these bugs grows with time. The 
method of immediate feedback in agile testing assures no time is spent in fixing the bug, 
managing in Cost of Quality.
High quality of products: Since development and testing go side by side, testing is not 
negotiated due to shortage of time as often occurs in the waterfall model. Agile testing 
discovers a defect every 6 minutes associated to 10hrs of conventional testing. Businesses 
that went agile have announced a 63% increase in quality and a 70% lower error rate.
Swiftly adjust to changes: With agility, it is likely to swiftly respond to changes in 
specifications or customer expectations managed by a changing business situation. Since 
work is done in small increments over a short period, it can incorporate changes and assure 
the functionality developed is appropriate and what the client requires at that point of 
time. This indicates greater client satisfaction.
Lower Risk: Expanding software in increments makes it likely to release a beta version of the 
product to get a quality of the market, rather than big-bang propaganda. Client feedback 
can assist in adding useful features in consecutive iterations following in a beneficial 
product. Also, at the beta stage, if the business does not seem to acknowledge conveniently 
to the product, then a company can even go for eliminating the project before it has spent 
too much money, time and energy into it.
Easy to manage: Agile teams are generally small in size and therefore are easy to manage. A 
small squad proposes fewer resourcing difficulties. All stakeholders know the functions they 
play and have fair and honest expectations from each other. Small teams acting on small 
iterations make it simple to plan the work, set realistic deadlines, director risks, and 
measure ROI.