Freedom of Speech and Its Restrictions
                     FREEDOM OF SPEECH 
AND ITS RESTRICTIONS
Introduction
Freedom of speech is a constitutional protection 
that gives individuals and communities the 
right to present their ideas and opinions 
without fear of being censored by the 
government. In the United States, the right to 
free speech, press, and assembly are 
guaranteed by the First Amendment of the 
Constitution. 
Source: study.com
The exchange of 
ideas
The exchange of ideas between people from 
different backgrounds is a key component to 
keeping a democracy healthy. While the 
government can censor some speech, 
American citizens are given the right to present 
their views publicly. 
Source: study.com
Pros
Allows minority communities to voice their 
concerns about the unique challenges they 
face.
New ideas are not stifled by the government, 
leading to technological and social 
advancement.
Can be used to reveal corrupt or unlawful 
actions committed by the government or 
corporations.
Source: study.com
Cons
Could be used to encourage violence against 
other members of society.
Allows the spread of potentially harmful 
misinformation.
Can be used by powerful individuals to drown 
out other voices.
Source: study.com
The Need to 
Protect 
Freedom of 
Speech
1. For the discovery of truth by open 
discussion.
2. It is an aspect of self-fulfilment and 
development.
3. To express beliefs and political attitudes.
4. To actively participate in a democracy.
Source: study.com
Restriction on 
Freedom of 
Speech
1. Security
2. Sovereignty and integrity of the country
3. Friendly relations with foreign countries
4. Public order
5. Decency or morality
6. Hate speech
7. Defamation
8. Contempt of court
Source: study.com
Freedom of 
Speech on 
Social Media
The High Court of Tripura has held that posting 
on social media was virtually the same as a 
fundamental right applicable to all citizens, 
including government employees. It also 
asserted that government servants are entitled 
to hold and express their political beliefs, 
subject to the restrictions laid under the Tripura 
Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1988.
Source: byjus.com
Hate Speech
The Supreme Court of India had asked the Law 
Commission to make recommendations to the 
Parliament to empower the Election 
Commission to restrict the problem of “hate 
speeches” irrespective of, whenever made. 
Source: byjus.com
Freedom of 
Speech in Art
In relation to art, the court has held that “the 
art must be so preponderating as to throw 
obscenity into a shadow or the obscenity so 
trivial and insignificant that it can have no 
effect and may be overlooked.” 
Source: byjus.com
THANK YOU