Uploaded on Feb 16, 2026
As universities face increasing pressure to meet ADA and Section 508 compliance, many turn to external vendors for PDF remediation. However, not all vendors are created equal. This presentation explores the most common mistakes higher education institutions make when choosing a remediation partner. Learn how to ensure your digital documents are truly accessible, legally compliant, and user-friendly for all students.
Common Mistakes Universities Make When Selecting PDF Remediation Vendors
Common Mistakes Universities
Make When Selecting PDF
Remediation Vendors
The Problem Universities Face
Complexity Time & Resources Legal & Compliance
Risk
Requires specialized skills Manual remediation Inaccessible PDFs can lead to
often lacking in-house demands significant effort lawsuits and exclude
and specialized staff training significant portions of users
2
[email protected] www.documenta11y.com
Mistake 1 - Relying Solely
on Automated Testing Tools
Issue:
• Adobe Accessibility Checker and PAC cannot test for full
compliance with Section 508, ADA, or WCAG 2.0/2.1.
• Automated tools cannot determine if alt text accurately
describes images.
• Complex tables require trained analysts for correct tagging.
• Accepting deliverables based only on automated tests
leads to discovering non-compliance later.
3
Mistake 2 - Choosing Vendors
Without Quality Assurance
What to look for:
• Multi-tier quality assurance processes combining
automation and human review.
• Expert accessibility specialists with experience in
complex documents.
• Compliance reports and validation documentation.
4
Mistake 3 - Ignoring Higher
Ed Specializations
• Pitfall: Hiring a generalist vendor.
• Reality: Academic documents contain specialized content like
STEM notation, complex citations, and multi-column layouts.
• Requirement: Ensure the vendor has experience with
academic terminology and complex pedagogical structures.
5
Mistake 4 - Failing to Address
Legacy & Scanned Documents
Requirements to be fulfilled by vendor:
• OCR (Optical Character Recognition) for scanned
documents.
• Converting image-based content into readable,
structured formats.
• Handling poor-quality scans and complex layouts.
6
Mistake 5 - Failing to
Provide Accessibility
Reports
• Pitfall: Accepting remediated files without validation data.
• Reality: You need proof of compliance for audits.
• Requirement: Vendors should provide a PAC (PDF
Accessibility Checker) report or a compliance certificate for
every document.
7
Mistake 6 - Lack of Scalability &
Slow Turnaround
• Pitfall: Choosing a vendor that cannot handle
high-volume remediation.
• Reality: Large-scale migrations of library archives
or course catalogs require a robust infrastructure.
• Requirement: Verify the pdf remediation
vendor’s capacity to handle high volumes without
compromising quality.
8
Red Flags to Watch For
No Human Unclear Pricing
Review
No Warranty Limited
Experience
9
Best Practices for Vendor
Selection
• Verify the vendor combines automated tools with
expert human review.
• Request samples of remediated documents and
compliance reports.
• Ensure they have experience with legacy and
scanned documents.
• Ask about their QA process and warranty terms.
• Get transparent pricing with per-page
breakdown.
10
[email protected] www.documenta11y.com
Any Questions?
We’re here to clarify any technical or compliance
concerns. Documenta11y specializes in the
complex nuances of Higher Ed PDF remediation
and bridges the gap between automated speed
and human precision.
Email us at [email protected]
Connect with our experts today.
Visit our website : www.documenta11y.com
11
Comments